Free plan
A$0Rubric-based score estimates and practical feedback to help you review your draft.
- 2,500 credits each UTC month
- Up to 3 active assignments
- 2 successful rubric extractions each UTC month
Email verification required. No card required.
RubricLock is an AI assignment grader that uses your teacher's marking rubric. Upload your draft for an estimated grade, criterion-by-criterion feedback, and clear next steps before you submit.
Free plan. No card required. Email verification required.AI estimates are a guide. Your teacher may mark differently.
Loading account access…Invented rubric and draft, with illustrative estimated marks. This is a static example, not a teacher's grade or a live AI result.
Explain how the unusual result affects confidence in your conclusion.
Use the growth measurements to test the hypothesis that more water increases seedling growth, and discuss unusual results and uncertainty.
10–12 / 15: compares results using numerical evidence and identifies unusual results, with limited analysis of uncertainty. 13–15 / 15: also explains how unusual results and uncertainty affect the conclusion.
After seven days, seedlings receiving 20 mL of water per day grew a mean of 22 mm, compared with 14 mm at 60 mL per day. One seedling in the 60 mL group grew 26 mm. This does not affect the conclusion because most seedlings in that group grew less.Draft discussion, paragraph 2
The draft compares the means (22 mm and 14 mm) and identifies the 26 mm result, meeting the 10–12 band. An illustrative 11 / 15 sits within that band because the draft dismisses the unusual result without explaining variability or how it limits confidence. The higher band requires that explanation.
Explain how the 26 mm result challenges a simple conclusion that more water always reduces growth. Compare the spread of repeated measurements, then qualify the conclusion to match the evidence. If those measurements are missing, identify that limitation instead of inventing data.
Your own feedback depends on your confirmed rubric and saved work. Your teacher may mark differently.
An AI grader reviews a draft and estimates how it meets assessment criteria. For students, its useful job is to make gaps easier to inspect: which requirement needs evidence, which explanation is incomplete, and what to revise next.
RubricLock gives that review a dedicated workflow. You confirm the uploaded rubric, save your assignment draft, and read feedback organised by criterion. The estimate helps you review your work; your teacher decides the official grade.
Read the AI grader for students guideThe marking guide supplies the criteria and score levels. Your draft supplies the evidence. Review both before treating an AI estimate as useful feedback.
Help RubricLock evaluate and calibrate rubric-based grading. When submissions open, a genuine, eligible contribution can earn 250 credits once after manual owner approval.
Uploads are being prepared. Check the contribution page for current status and programme details.A general chatbot can review a draft against a rubric if you supply it and ask for evidence. A bare “grade my assignment” request leaves the marking standard unspecified. The difference here is the workflow, not a promise of greater accuracy.
Use the rubric review checklistCompare the free plan and Student PlusRead the assignment grading FAQ
Rubric-based score estimates and practical feedback to help you review your draft.
Email verification required. No card required.
More grading capacity and a deeper review of saved work.
Save A$19.89 with annual billing compared with twelve monthly payments.
Renews until cancelled. Monthly credits do not roll over, including on the annual plan.
Top up your credits when you need more. Purchased credits are separate from your monthly allowance and do not expire.
A credit top-up does not include Student Plus features.
The free plan is ongoing, with monthly limits. Student Plus is a paid subscription with no trial period. Paid purchases use the existing Stripe Checkout flow; availability depends on product configuration.
Credits are your service allowance. Each successful check costs one credit per two submitted words, rounded up, with a minimum of 100 credits. Rechecking a draft uses credits again. Successful rubric extractions beyond the included allowance cost 200 credits each. Failed or unvalidated checks are not charged. File, page, and monthly check limits also apply; a credit balance is not a guaranteed number of checks.
Practical checks you can use with or without a feedback tool.
Browse all student guidesMatch each criterion to evidence in your work.
Explain how a choice in the text shapes meaning.
Connect the pattern, variation and conclusion.
Yes. Upload your teacher's rubric as a PDF, DOCX, TXT, Markdown, JPG, or PNG file, then review and confirm the extracted criteria before checking your draft. Use only material you have permission to send to an external service.
No. RubricLock estimates a score from your confirmed rubric and saved work. Your teacher may mark differently. It cannot guarantee accuracy, a grade, or an improvement. Follow your course's rules about AI-assisted feedback.
After email verification, the free plan includes rubric-based feedback, 2,500 credits and 2 successful rubric extractions each UTC month, and up to 3 active assignments. Default file and page limits are 10 MB per file and 10 pages per submission; credit, grading-request, and storage limits also apply. No card is required. Student Plus features require a verified paid entitlement.
Your rubrics, saved work, and reports are stored with your account. Relevant content is sent to the configured AI provider when the workflow needs it. A share link lets anyone with that link see its included report fields until it expires or you revoke it. Provider copies and backups may follow separate retention rules. Read the Privacy page for storage, sharing, retention, and deletion details.